Decision: Option 1C: “Individual Briefings”
Stakeholder Leader Adoption Levels:
Leader Rate
Leader State of Mind
Lena (R&D): 3
Evaluation – feels heard, valued as an expert, and sees a collaborative path
Sarah (Sales): 2
Interest – appreciates being consulted, cautiously optimistic if market needs are met
Markus (Ops): 1
Awareness – still very cautious, but appreciates the respect shown for his concerns and willingness to listen
David (Finance): 1
Awareness – appreciates the early heads-up, outlines information needs clearly
Maria (HR): 2
Interest – feels involved, sees potential for a well-managed change, offers support
Impact on Stakeholder Teams:
R&D Team: Lena shares her positive interaction, boosting team morale and confidence in the Task Force’s approach.
Sales Team: Sarah might informally mention a “new innovation project” is coming, but her more open stance (due to being consulted) means she’ll likely frame it less negatively when it’s formally announced to them.
OPS Team: Markus, while still concerned, might communicate to his direct reports that the Task Force is “at least willing to listen to us before they charge ahead,” slightly reducing pre-emptive negativity.
Finance Team: David will be better prepared to guide his team on what financial data to start gathering once the project details are clearer.
HR Team: Maria feels empowered to start thinking proactively with her team about communication and support strategies, based on the collaborative tone set.
Feedback (from Leaders & Teams): Leaders appreciate being consulted individually and feel their perspectives are valued. This builds initial rapport and trust. Lena is highly engaged. Sarah and Maria are open to learning more. Markus and David, while still skeptical, are not actively resistant at this stage because they’ve been heard. The Task Force gathers crucial intelligence on individual motivators, concerns, and preferred communication styles, which will be vital for engaging their teams. This approach acknowledges the “Endings” by not immediately forcing new information.
